Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Sanger v. New York

Sanger v. N.Y., 251 U.S. 537 (1919)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1919-11-17
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v¿ Davis, 151 U. ,S. 389, 393; Sayward v. *538Denny, 158 U. S. 180, 183; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sanger v. New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v¿ Davis, 151 U. ,S. 389, 393; Sayward v. *538 Denny, 158 U. S. 180, 183; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86. (2) Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664; and see El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S. 643. Mr. Jonah J. Goldstein for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry G. Anderson, with whom Mr. Harry E. Lewis was on the brief, for defendant in error.