Salt Lake County v. Sheets

holding that Illinois federal court erred in giving preclusive effect to Minnesota state court’s dismissal of action on statute of limitations grounds based on Minnesota’s treatment of statutes of limitations as procedural in nature and without preclusive effect | stating: “[W]e will allow an appeal only as to those discretionary aspects of sentencing which have not been agreed upon during the negotiation process” | district court's denial of a motion for remittitur is entitled to considerable deference on appeal and will not disturbed absent a gross abuse of discretion | district court's denial of a motion for remitti-tur is entitled to considerable deference on appeal and will not disturbed absent a gross abuse of discretion | though the defendants had a subjective expectation of privacy, the use of a thermal imager was not unreasonable because it did not disclose intimate details or intrude in to the privacy of their premises