Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Rummel v. Musgrave
364 U.S. 293
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1960-10-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- non-fugitive’s claim on habeas that demanding state’s statute unconstitutional rejected by court which held that “asylum state in habeas corpus proceedings need not and should not review the constitutionality of the statute that is alleged to have been violated”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rummel v. Musgrave. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.