Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ruark v. Colorado
378 U.S. 585
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-06-22
- Topic
- general
378 U.S. 585 (1964) RUARK v. COLORADO. No. 1173, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 22, 1964.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ruark v. Colorado. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 35 opinions
RUARK
v.
COLORADO.
No. 1173, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.Petitioner pro se.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.