Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Royal Food Products, Inc. v. Buckeye Union Insurance Co.

510 U.S. 817

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-10-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding Attorney General's certification reviewable and that the case could not be remanded if the certification was invalidated and the United States was no longer a party
  • even false statements in a defamation case may be considered as conduct within an employee’s scope of employment
  • 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1447(d) only concerns appellate review of "[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed"
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) only concerns appellate re view of “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed”
  • “[I]t is well-established that a law enforcement official has probable cause to arrest if he received his information from some person, normally the putative victim or eyewitness, who it seems reasonable to believe is telling the truth.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Royal Food Products, Inc. v. Buckeye Union Insurance Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
59 opinions

510 U.S. 817

Royal Food Products, Inc.
v.
Buckeye Union Insurance Co. et al.

No. 92-1857.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 985 F. 2d 561.