Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.

attorney’s failure'correctly to inform client about parole eligibility can amount to constitutional violation if it directly affects decision to plead guilty | evidence was not "obtained in violation" of Illinois law within meaning of Illinois exclusionary provision where evidence was validly intercepted in Maryland, even though interception would have been invalid if accomplished in Illinois | evidence was not “obtained in violation” of Illinois law within meaning of Illinois exclusionary provision where evidence was validly intercepted in Maryland, even though interception would have been invalid if accomplished in Illinois | erroneous parole advice may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel