Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Rowe v. Allied Chemical Hourly Employees' Pension Plan
Rowe v. Allied Chem. Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, 103 L. Ed. 2d 576 (1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-02-27
- Topic
- general
stating that plaintiff did not meet burden when it pled in very general terms, and did not allege who made or received fraudulent statements | stating that plaintiff did not meet burden when it pled in very general terms, and did not allege who made or received fraudulent statements | permitting amendment of RICO complaint which failed to plead predicate acts of mail and wire fraud with sufficient particularity under Rule 9(b) | blanket allegation of mail and wire fraud in RICO case, without indicating who made or received fraudulent representation, is insufficient under Rule 9(b) | complaint dismissed where it alleged “the general content of the representations,” but did not specify “who the speakers were ... or who received the information ... ” | multiple inducements to retire made to thirty-two retirees over roughly six months | vacated for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court’s decision in Firestone | Rule 9(b) requires “detailed allegations” of fraud
Citator
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, ante, p. 101.