Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Rowe v. Allied Chemical Hourly Employees' Pension Plan

Rowe v. Allied Chem. Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, 103 L. Ed. 2d 576 (1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-02-27
Topic
general

stating that plaintiff did not meet burden when it pled in very general terms, and did not allege who made or received fraudulent statements | stating that plaintiff did not meet burden when it pled in very general terms, and did not allege who made or received fraudulent statements | permitting amendment of RICO complaint which failed to plead predicate acts of mail and wire fraud with sufficient particularity under Rule 9(b) | blanket allegation of mail and wire fraud in RICO case, without indicating who made or received fraudulent representation, is insufficient under Rule 9(b) | complaint dismissed where it alleged “the general content of the representations,” but did not specify “who the speakers were ... or who received the information ... ” | multiple inducements to retire made to thirty-two retirees over roughly six months | vacated for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court’s decision in Firestone | Rule 9(b) requires “detailed allegations” of fraud

Citator

Cited by
25 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, ante, p. 101.