Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Roscoe v. Arizona

471 U.S. 1094

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-04-29
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • aggravating circumstances found: that murder committed while defendant was engaged in first-degree burglary and that murder was part of a course of violent conduct
  • reversing in part because defense counsel failed to move to suppress witness’s clothing identification after impermissibly suggestive procedure
  • "The words 'heinous' and 'depraved' refer [respectively] to the nature of the crime and the state of defendant's mind."
  • defendant stabbed seventy-two-year-old victim several times with steak knife and pocket knife, inflicted numerous bruises and fractures, attempted to rape her, and stole her pocketbook
  • defendant murdered seventy-two year old woman then stabbed and sexually assaulted the victim’s mentally retarded daughter
  • evidence of a brutal attack, sexual assault, and strangulation sufficient to support a finding of premeditation and deliberation
  • defendant had previously been convicted of common law robbery, and during the murder for which he received the death sentence he had assaulted another with a deadly weapon, inflicting serious injury
  • trial within 60 days is not a constitutional mandate; a trial court may grant a continuance to allow defense counsel more time to prepare for trial over the express objections of a defendant

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Roscoe v. Arizona. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
211 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

Sup. Ct. Wash.; and

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 84-6302, 145 Ariz. 212, 700 P. 2d 1312; No. 84-6306, 103 Wash. 2d 1, 691 P. 2d 929; No. 84-6364, 312 N. C. 499, 324 S. E. 2d 250.