Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Roe v. Doe

420 U.S. 307

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1975-02-19
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Roe v. Doe. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
ROEv. DOE,420 U.S. 307(1975)
ROE ET AL.v. DOE.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 73-1446.
Argued December 18, 1974.
Decided February 19, 1975.
33 N.Y.2d 902,307 N.E.2d 823, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Marvin M. Karpatkinargued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs wasMichael N. Pollet.Ephraim S. Londonargued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief wereFranklin S. Bonem, BonnieP. Winawer, andHelen L. Buttenwieser.fn*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.Page 308
  1. Page 307Ira M. Millsteinfiled a brief for the Association of American Publishers, Inc., asamicus curiaeurging reversal.Joseph Onekfiled a brief for the American Psychiatric Assn. et al. asamici curiaeurging affirmance. ↩