Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

concluding that sentences were not unconstitutional because indictments failed to specify that crack cocaine would be included in calculating base offense levels; crack was part of the same cocaine conspiracy charged in the counts of conviction | holding that agency's stated objective should be upheld where reasonable | holding that agency’s stated objective should be upheld where reasonable | challenging a guideline enhancement based on amounts of crack cocaine involved that were neither charged in the indictment nor proven at trial | challenging a guideline enhancement based on amounts of crack cocaine involved that were neither charged in the indictment nor proven at trial | courts should not allow uncharged conduct to become “the tail that wags the dog of the substantive offense” | courts should not allow uncharged conduct to become "the tail that wags the dog of the substantive offense" | LEXIS, Genfed library, Dist file