Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ramos-Pacheco v. United States

Ramos-Pacheco v. United States, 531 U.S. 1096 (2001)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2001-01-08
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that § 924(c)(1)(A)® is a penalty provision with sentencing implications when a firearm is brandished
  • “[T]he testimony that Dr. Hoover gave during the guilt phase was clearly competent and more than sufficient to allow for the submission of the ... (f)(2) and (f)(6) mitigating circumstances to the jury.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ramos-Pacheco v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.