Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Radford v. Folsom
131 U.S. 392
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1888-11-26
- Topic
- general
131 U.S. 392 9 S.Ct. 792 33 L.Ed. 203 RADFORD v. FOLSOM. November 26, 1888.1 H. H. Trimble and Joseph G.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Radford v. Folsom. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
33 L.Ed. 203
RADFORD
v.
FOLSOM.
November 26, 1888.1
H. H. Trimble and Joseph G. Anderson, for the motion.
Walter H. Smith, with whom was M. F. Sapp, contra.
[Argument of Counsel from page 393 intentionally omitted]
PER CURIAM.
1
This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
1
Publication delayed through failure to receive copy.