Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.

agreeing that front pay may be an appropriate remedy when reinstatement is inappropriate | prolonged exposure to sexually hostile employee who was habitually vulgar and displayed nude photos at work | promptness and adequacy of employer’s response to correct instances of alleged sexual harassment is of significance in assessing a sexually hostile environment claim | proof that the harassment significantly affects plaintiffs psychological well-being essential element of harassment claim | district court’s interpretation of facts is to be adopted where multiple interpretations may exist | "A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." | “A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | front pay appropriate when necessary to make plaintiff whole