Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Quaker Oats Co. v. Pennsylvania

Quaker Oats Co. v. Pa., 324 U.S. 827 (1945)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1945-03-12
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 165 ; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Quaker Oats Co. v. Pennsylvania. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 165 ; Educational Films Corp. v. Ward, 282 U. S. 379; Ford Motor Co. v. Beauchamp, 308 U. S. 331; Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501; (2) Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111; Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Wisconsin, 247 U. S. 132; (3) Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-323; (4) Western Live *828 Stock v. Bureau, 303 U. S. 250, 256, and cases cited.

Messrs. W. A. Seifert, Geo. Ross Hull and Roy J. Keefer for appellant. James H. Duff, Attorney General, and Mr. H. F. Stambaugh for appellee.