Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Purcell v. Arizona
Purcell v. Ariz., 137 S. Ct. 369 (2016)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2016-10-31
- Topic
- general
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Purcell v. Arizona. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).
Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 11, --- L.E.2d ---- (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).