Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

523 U.S. 1077

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-04-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that even where a counterclaim is included as part of a timely-filed answer under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, where state law established limitations period, limitations not tolled as to untimely counterclaim
  • The Act's requirement that an infringing use be in "commerce" encompasses non-profit services.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pro-Football, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.