Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Perales v. Krieger

Perales v. Krieger, 98 L. Ed. 2d 679 (1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-01-11
Topic
general

holding that determination of indispensability is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review | holding that determination of indispensability is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review | finding that the prejudice of proceeding without the nondiverse party could be avoided by ordering the arbitration to be held in a different state | reviewing motion brought under Rule 19 de novo

Citator

Cited by
59 opinions

Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.