Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pennsylvania v. Ware
405 U.S. 987
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-03-20
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
the parol evidence rule excludes evidence of negotiations that are introduced to vary, add to, or contradict the terms of a valid written instrument. | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground"
Citator
- Cited by
- 33 opinions
Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.