Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pennsylvania v. Ware

405 U.S. 987

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-03-20
Topic
labor-and-employment

the parol evidence rule excludes evidence of negotiations that are introduced to vary, add to, or contradict the terms of a valid written instrument. | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground" | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground” | "it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground"

Citator

Cited by
33 opinions

Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.