Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pele Defense Fund v. Paty

507 U.S. 918

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-02-22
Topic
general

providing a brief description of the "ceded lands” and listing the five purposes identified in section 5(f) of the Admission Act | listing cases and stating that if an expert fails to present sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could conclude that the expert's position is more likely than not true, a trial court remains free to grant a directed verdict or summary judgment | plaintiff had "a full and fair opportunity to litigate the relevant issues” and so was precluded by collateral estoppel from raising the issues again | "Issues not properly raised on appeal will be deemed to be waived.” (Citations omitted.) | “Article XII, Section 4 [of the Hawai'i State Constitution] imposes a fiduciary duty on Hawai'i’s officials to hold ceded lands in accordance with Section 59(f) trust -provisions, and the citizens of the state must have a means to mandate compliance.” | issue on appeal deemed waived

Citator

Cited by
30 opinions

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.