Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Pauling v. McElroy
364 U.S. 835
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1960-10-10
- Topic
- litigation
The motion to substitute Robert E. Wilson and Loren K. Olson in the place of H. S. Vance and John F.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pauling v. McElroy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The motion to substitute Robert E. Wilson and Loren K. Olson in the place of H. S. Vance and John F. Floberg as parties respondent is granted. The motion to substitute Thomas E. Gates in the place of Neil H. McElroy as a party respondent is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.