Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York
107 L. Ed. 2d 154
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-02
- Topic
- general
affirming trial court ruling that confusing similarity may exist between infringer’s use of "No-Twist” on "C" clamps and protected user's "Kant-Twist” | vacating reinstatement of pilot who was found to have flown commercial plane while intoxicated | vacating arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated | vacating\ arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated | affirming decision of district court which set aside an arbitration award clearly violating public policy where arbitration award ordered reinstatement of a pilot who had been discharged after he had flown a passenger plane while intoxicated | vacating an arbitration award that reinstated a pilot who flew while intoxicated | "An arbitrator's result may be wrong; it may appear unsupported; it may appear poorly reasoned; it may appear foolish. Yet, it may not be subject to court interference" | award which reinstated pilot who flew while intoxicated was struck down | denied reinstatement to pilot who flew passenger plane while intoxicated | nuclear power plant machinist intentionally violated federally mandated secondary containment rules | award which reinstated pilot who flew while intoxicated was struck down | negligence of two employees resulted in serious accident | denied reinstatement to pilot who flew passenger plane while intoxicated | state lemon law not preempted by Magnuson-Moss | state lemon law not preempted by Magnuson-Moss | flying airplane under influence of alcohol
Citator
- Cited by
- 47 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.Reported below: 860 F. 2d 1145.