Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States

adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated | "These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed " | “These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed....” | dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power | in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal | mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official | “a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.” | analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b) | analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b) | claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act | analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under § 10(b)