Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States

Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States, 414 U.S. 910 (1973)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1973-10-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated
  • "These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed "
  • dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power
  • in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal
  • mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official
  • “a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.”
  • analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b)
  • claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
224 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.