Odom Construction Co. v. United States Department of Labor

holding that an EIS is not required when "the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo." | holding that an EIS is not required when “the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo.” | construing Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(g) as bright-line rule that grand jury’s term begins on impanelment date, regardless of first day of service | construing Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(g) as bright-line rule that grand jury's term begins on impanelment date, regardless of first day of service | mooring blocks used for barges awaiting stevedoring services at nearby wharf | mooring blocks used for barges awaiting stevedoring services at nearby wharf | "An EIS is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo" | construction worker injured while removing concrete blocks from canal covered because his activity significantly "furthered maritime commerce" | “An EIS is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo” | construction worker injured while removing concrete blocks from canal covered because his activity significantly "furthered maritime commerce" | upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information | “Improper joinder under Rule 8 requires mandatory severance.” | upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information