Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Portland Audubon Society

109 S. Ct. 3229

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-06-26
Topic
general

holding that improper bolstering occurred where testimony shows a witness attended a lineup but no evidence that the witness identified the defendant, and the case goes to trial, the logical conclusion is that the witness did identify the defendant. | holding that improper bolstering occurred where testimony shows a witness attended a lineup but no evidence that the witness identified the defendant, and the case goes to trial, the logical conclusion is that the witness did identify the defendant.

Citator

Cited by
36 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Mountain States Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.