Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd

270 U.S. 625

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1926-01-18
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Northern Cedar Co. v. Gloyd. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford *626 ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.

Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.