Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter

Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter, 181 U.S. 615 (1901)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1901-05-13
Topic: general

Per Curiam. Order affirmed with costs on the author*616ity qí Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; Kohl v. Lehlback, 160 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nordstrom ex rel. Denning v. Van de Vanter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed with costs on the author *616 ity qí Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; Kohl v. Lehlback, 160 U. S. 293, and see State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403; Nordstrom v. Moyer, Sheriff, 170 U. S. 703; Nordstrom v. Washington, 164 U. S. 705; Craemer v. Washington, 168 U. S. 124; State v. Nordstrom, 7 Wash. 506.

Mr. Walter S. Fulton and Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaite for the motions. Mr. James Hamilton Lewis opposing.