Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Nolan v. Rhodes
383 U.S. 104
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1966-02-21
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Per Curiam. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nolan v. Rhodes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.