Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Nolan v. Rhodes

Nolan v. Rhodes, 378 U.S. 556 (1964)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-06-22
Topic
bankruptcy

Per Curiam. The judgment below is reversed. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nolan v. Rhodes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
NOLANv. RHODES,378 U.S. 556(1964)
NOLANv. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO.
No. 454.
Decided June 22, 1964.fn*
Judgment reversed and cases remanded.

Reported below:218 F. Supp. 953.
Kenneth G. WeinbergandStewart R. Jaffyfor appellant in No. 454.William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, andHughA. Shererfor appellees in No. 454.Jerome Goldman, Robert P. GoldmanandHarrisWestonfor appellants in No. 455.William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio,Gerald A.Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, andJohn J.Chesterfor appellees in No. 455.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is reversed.Reynoldsv.Sims,377 U.S. 533. The cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions inReynoldsv.Simsand in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along withReynolds.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion inReynoldsv.Sims,377 U.S. 533,587.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment because the Ohio system of legislative apportionment isPage 557clearly a rational one and clearly does not frustrate effective majority rule.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion inReynoldsv.Sims,377 U.S. 533,589.
  1. Page 556 Together with No. 455,Sive et al. v.Ellis et al.,also on appeal from the same court. ↩