Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Cullen & Cullen

Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Cullen & Cullen, 513 U.S. 816 (1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-10-03
Topic
general

finding that the Double Jeopardy Clause would not bar recovery by the government of $50 million where the government’s total loss was only $15 million | excluded visitor not “seized” where “ ‘free to go anywhere else that he desired,’ with the exception of [the judge’s] chambers and the court house” | when deciding a Rule 12(c) motion, the court applies the same standard as that applicable to a 12(b)(6) motion | when deciding a Rule 12(e) motion, the court applies the same standard as that applicable to a 12(b)(6) motion | granting restitution to the extent justice requires | granting restitution to the extent justice requires

Citator

Cited by
39 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.