Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Newton v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc.
461 U.S. 914
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-02
- Topic
- general
holding that “the institution of the plaintiffs suit tolls or suspends the running of the statute of limitations governing a compulsory counterclaim.” | offsetting against plaintiff's gross damages "the amount which plaintiffs would have paid ... in the absence of the royalty-maintenance conspiracy" | offsetting against plaintiff’s gross damages “the amount which plaintiffs would have paid ... in the absence of the royalty-maintenance conspiracy” | "[T]he heretofore unbroken rule has been that any settlement payments are deducted from the damages awarded after trebling" | 10-day statutory stay does not apply to closure of state chartered savings and loan association by federal receiver; due process satisfied by state law providing for possibility of post-seizure judicial review | in holding that antitrust counterclaims were compulsory counterclaims to original action asserting breach of a licensing agreement, the court distinguished Mercoid on its facts and stated that Mercoid’s “continuing validity is open to serious question” | settlement deductions made after trebling in antitrust cases | settlement deductions made after trebling in antitrust cases
Citator
- Cited by
- 48 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.