Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial Corp.

516 U.S. 1049

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-01-08
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that "[e]ven if the prosecutor's remarks were prejudicial, the district judge gave a curative instruction which, under settled Eleventh Circuit law, would render any error harmless where the evidence of guilt was overwhelming"
  • reviewing for “manifest miscarriage of justice” because defendant failed to move for directed verdict or judgment of acquittal
  • discussing the principles underlying disclosure requirements of § 329 and FRBP 2016 but noting that the disclosure requirements of FRBP 2014 are applied just as strictly.
  • even a negligent or inadvertent failure to disclose a connection with a party in interest may result in a denial of all requested fees

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Neben & Starrett, Inc. v. Chartwell Financial Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
58 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.