Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mutual Reserve Life Insurance v. Birch
200 U.S. 612
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1905-12-18
- Topic
- general
In error to the Supreme Court of the State o'f New York. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with ten per cent damages, in addition to interest-and costs. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Phelps, 190 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mutual Reserve Life Insurance v. Birch. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
In error to the Supreme Court of the State o'f New York.
Per Curiam.Judgment affirmed with ten per cent damages, in addition to interest-and costs. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association v. Phelps, 190 U. S. 147; Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Spratley, 172 U. S. 602; Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188; Richardson v. L. & N. Railroad Company, 169 U. S. 128; Young v. Valentine, 177 N. Y. 347; Woodward v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company, 178 N. Y. 485; Birch v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company, 181 N. Y. 583; S. C., 91 App. Div. 384.