Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.

498 U.S. 1016

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-12-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • observing that “Congress’ purpose in enacting § 1346 was to restore the mail fraud statute to its pre- McNally position”
  • "Park 'N Fly does not preclude consideration of a mark’s strength for purposes of determining the likelihood of confusion.”
  • “A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney’s failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritoriousf.]”
  • "A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on a trial attorney's failure to make a motion or objection must demonstrate not only the absence of a tactical reason for the omission ... but also that the motion or objection would have been meritorious[.]"
  • denying petition for writ of certiorari
  • property interest in medical license

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Munters Corp. v. Matsui America, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
67 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.