Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Morrison v. California
288 U.S. 591
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1933-02-20
- Topic
- general
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California. Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Morrison v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.
Per Curiam:The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178, 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502. (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258, 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225, 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.