Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Missouri v. Parker

506 U.S. 1014

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-11-30
Topic
labor-and-employment

holding in a postconviction relief case that "prejudicially affected" is defined as "a reasonable probability that counsel's error affected the outcome of the trial" | holding in a postconviction relief case that “prejudicially affected” is defined as “a reasonable probability that counsel’s error affected the outcome of the trial” | holding that § 1983 preempted the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act | motor carrier exemption applied to employee who traveled only within state but who regularly collected empty containers destined for out-of-state bottling facilities | “Once a full record has been developed, ... the factfinder should proceed to the specific question of whether the action of the employer was discriminatory” | “[The court] will not search the record in an effort to determine whether there exists ... evidence which might require submission of the case to a jury.” | A document must be identified or authenticated by affidavit or sworn testimony. | "Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”

Citator

Cited by
116 opinions

Sup. Ct. Mo. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.