Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Missouri v. Parker
506 U.S. 1014
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-11-30
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
How later courts describe this case
- holding in a postconviction relief case that "prejudicially affected" is defined as "a reasonable probability that counsel's error affected the outcome of the trial"
- holding that § 1983 preempted the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act
- motor carrier exemption applied to employee who traveled only within state but who regularly collected empty containers destined for out-of-state bottling facilities
- “Once a full record has been developed, ... the factfinder should proceed to the specific question of whether the action of the employer was discriminatory”
- “[The court] will not search the record in an effort to determine whether there exists ... evidence which might require submission of the case to a jury.”
- A document must be identified or authenticated by affidavit or sworn testimony.
- "Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Missouri v. Parker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 306 opinions
Sup. Ct. Mo. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.