Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Missouri v. Parker

506 U.S. 1014

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-11-30
Topic
labor-and-employment

How later courts describe this case

  • holding in a postconviction relief case that "prejudicially affected" is defined as "a reasonable probability that counsel's error affected the outcome of the trial"
  • holding that § 1983 preempted the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act
  • motor carrier exemption applied to employee who traveled only within state but who regularly collected empty containers destined for out-of-state bottling facilities
  • “Once a full record has been developed, ... the factfinder should proceed to the specific question of whether the action of the employer was discriminatory”
  • “[The court] will not search the record in an effort to determine whether there exists ... evidence which might require submission of the case to a jury.”
  • A document must be identified or authenticated by affidavit or sworn testimony.
  • "Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Missouri v. Parker. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
306 opinions

Sup. Ct. Mo. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.