Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman
296 U.S. 537
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1935-10-14
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 649-651; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.