Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 531 U.S. 1009 (2000)
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 531 U.S. 1009 (2000), 531 U.S. 1009 (2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2000-01-01
- Topic
- general
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 531 U.S. 1009 (2000) NOVEMBER 27, 2000 99-10160 IN RE RETTIG. C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 809] denied. 00-5250 SHAFER v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 531 U.S. 1009 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS,531 U.S. 1009(2000)
NOVEMBER 27, 2000
00-5250 SHAFER v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. S.C. [Certiorari granted,530 U.S. 1306.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that David I. Bruck, Esq., of Columbia, S.C., be appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
00-6310 BALDEN ET UX. v. COTTEE ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir.; and
00-6347 SIMPSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceedinforma pauperisdenied. Petitioner are allowed until December 18, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
00-6754 IN RE GREGORY;
00-6908 IN RE SUAREZ; and
00-6931 IN RE CHARLES. Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.
00-6824 IN RE GUST JANIS. Petition for a writ of mandamus denied.