Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Miller v. United States

Miller v. United States, 459 U.S. 856 (1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-10-04
Topic
general

"the sentencing court may not present the defendant with a choice between admitting his guilt and enduring a harsher sentence for failing to do so" | “the sentencing court may not present the defendant with a choice between admitting his guilt and enduring a harsher sentence for failing to do so” | “[T]he sentencing court may not present the defendant with a choice between admitting his guilt and enduring a harsher sentence for failing to do so.” | "[T]he sentencing court may not present the defendant with a choice between admitting his guilt and enduring a harsher sentence for failing to do so." | motive of defrauded investors to invest in corporation was relevant to establish their reliance on the misrepresentations by corporate officers | district court’s failure to hold a James hearing, by itself, is not reversible error | general contractor agreed to pay directly to the materialman the unpaid balance due from the sub to the materialman, and also agreed to pay directly for future orders of materials | general contractor agreed to pay directly to the materialman the unpaid balance due from the sub to the materialman, and also agreed to pay directly for future orders of materials

Citator

Cited by
27 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.