Microsoft Corp. v. United States

explaining that Judge Rehnquist “therefore considered at length whether [my son’s] representation requires me to disqualify myself on the Microsoft matters currently before this Court” | order by Chief Justice Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son’s law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | order by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son's law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | order by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son's law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | order by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son’s law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | order by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son’s law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | order by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist denying motion to recuse where his son’s law firm represented a party but his personal and financial concerns were unaffected | “Not only is the Court deprived of the participation of one of its nine Members, but the even number of those remaining creates a risk of affir-mance of a lower court decision by an equally divided court.” | wherein Justice Rehnquist responded denying a motion for his disqualification | wherein Justice Rehnquist responded denying a motion for his disqualification | Statement of Chief Justice Rehnquist on decision not to recuse | Justice Rehnquist denied the motion for his disqualification. | Rehnquist, Chief Justice, writing separately