Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.
Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 516 U.S. 824 (1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-10-02
- Topic
- litigation
holding that review of fees was necessary in all class action settlements to prevent both abuse of appearance and public misunderstanding | overturning nationwide class settlement but noting that courts have certified nationwide class actions relying on capacity for court to decertify or redefine class subsequently if case becomes unmanageable | overturning nationwide class settlement but noting that courts have certified nationwide class actions relying on capacity for court to decertify or redefine class subsequently if case becomes unmanageable | “Although it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding.” | "[A]lthough it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding." | "One sign that a settlement may not be fair is that some segments of the class are treated differently from others.” | describing "fiduciary responsibility" of courts in class actions | describing “fiduciary responsibility” of courts in class actions
Citator
- Cited by
- 58 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.