Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mena v. San Diego County Department of Social Services

486 U.S. 1058

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-06-13
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that it is not necessary for the district court to personally question the defendant as to whether he has read the PSI
  • adopting the Mays rule and holding that the Rone rule is an inappropriate and unnecessary extension of Rule 32(a)(1) and the district court may draw reasonable inferences about whether defendant has had an opportunity to review the report and to discuss it with counsel

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mena v. San Diego County Department of Social Services. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.