Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mead Emballage, S. A. v. Bernstein
107 L. Ed. 2d 108
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-02
- Topic
- general
"[F]ederal law regard- ing relation back of amendments to pleadings is controlling in diversity cases in federal court.” | "[T]he district court, when confronted with an amendment to add a non[-]diverse non[-]indispensable party, should use its discretion in deciding whether to allow that party to be added."
Citator
- Cited by
- 27 opinions
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.