Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mead Emballage, S. A. v. Bernstein
493 U.S. 851
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "[F]ederal law regarding relation back of amendments to pleadings is controlling in diversity cases in federal court.”
- "[T]he district court, when confronted with an amendment to add a non[-]diverse non[-]indispensable party, should use its discretion in deciding whether to allow that party to be added."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mead Emballage, S. A. v. Bernstein. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 54 opinions
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.