Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mead Emballage, S. A. v. Bernstein

107 L. Ed. 2d 108

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-02
Topic
general

"[F]ederal law regard- ing relation back of amendments to pleadings is controlling in diversity cases in federal court.” | "[T]he district court, when confronted with an amendment to add a non[-]diverse non[-]indispensable party, should use its discretion in deciding whether to allow that party to be added."

Citator

Cited by
27 opinions

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.