Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McLaughlin v. United States

251 U.S. 541

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1920-01-12
Topic: general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McLaughlin v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-337; O’Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36, 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89. (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581; Sugarman v. United States, *542 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.