Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.

111 S. Ct. 536

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-11-26
Topic
general

readministering Miranda warnings was insufficient to clarify when detective made negative comments designed to persuade suspect to keep talking | drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction | “the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required” | alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership | breach of contract does not constitute a scheme to defraud

Citator

Cited by
32 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.