Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.
111 S. Ct. 536
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-11-26
- Topic
- general
readministering Miranda warnings was insufficient to clarify when detective made negative comments designed to persuade suspect to keep talking | drawing distinction between procedural challenges to agency action, which must be brought within statutory review period or be forever barred, and substantive challenges, which are not subject to such a restriction | “the scope of fraud under these [federal fraud] statutes is broader than common law fraud, and ... no misrepresentation of fact is required” | alleged kickbacks in violation of federal law were not deceptive because they did not induce plaintiff to give, up its exclusive dealership | breach of contract does not constitute a scheme to defraud
Citator
- Cited by
- 32 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.