Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McDonald v. Scott

515 U.S. 1106

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-05-30
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • recognizing that defendant’s drawing had “an inferential bearing 7 on his character for violence, which relates in turn to the question of future dangerousness”
  • holding that unadjudicated offenses may be introduced during capital sentencing
  • defendant, convicted of capital murder in the course of aggravated sexual assault and burglary, threw woman up against a wall and tried to kiss her after she rebuffed his sexual advances
  • prosecutor' s characterization of defendant as " beast" did not warrant reversal, "[ a] lthough prosecutors ought to refrain from [ making such] characterizations"
  • prosecutor' s comment alluding to suffering of victim and victim' s family did not appeal to passion or prejudice, as it was based on evidence presented at trial

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McDonald v. Scott. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
159 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.