Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McAdams v. McSurely
438 U.S. 189
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-06-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- on appeal from denial of motion to dismiss for absolute immunity under the Speech & Debate Clause, "the question of appealability does not turn on the correctness of an appellant's claim(s)"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McAdams v. McSurely. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
438 U.S. 189 (1978)
McADAMS, EXECUTOR, ET AL.
No. 76-1621.
McADAMS, EXECUTOR, ET AL.
v.
McSURELY ET UX.
No. 76-1621.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 1, 1978. Decided June 26, 1978. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.Deputy Solicitor General Easterbrook argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Acting Solicitor General Friedman and Assistant Attorney General Babcock.
Morton Stavis argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Doris Peterson, Nancy Stearns, Dan Jack Combs, and Charles N. Mason, Jr.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.