Mastrian v. Cudd

holding that where the trial court finds the integrity of the tapes to be undisturbed, a delay in sealing is not, in and of itself, sufficient reason to suppress the evidence obtained | holding that where the trial court finds the integrity of the tapes to be undisturbed, a delay in sealing is not, in and of itself, sufficient reason to suppress the evidence obtained | “Nor is such use controlled by 47 U.S.C. § 605, as amended.” | "Nor is such use controlled by 47 U.S.C. § 605, as amended." | the attorney general was “fully aware of the facts of the specific case” | 45 day delay not in itself sufficient to suppress evidence