Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Martin v. Haith

91 L. Ed. 2d 559

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1986-06-23
Topic
general

the Act applies "to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote" | the Act applies "to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote" | employees who continued to work in their old jobs upon sale of division found to be outside the scope of "job elimination" under severance pay policy | employees who continued to work in their old jobs upon sale of division found to be outside the scope of “job elimination” under severance pay policy | the Act applies “to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote” | the Act applies “to all voting without any limitation as to who, or what, is the object of the vote" | "We hold the fact that an election law deals with the election of members of the judiciary does not remove it from the ambit of section 5.” | summarily affirming district court’s application of § 5 to judicial elections

Citator

Cited by
66 opinions

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. N. C.