Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mahoney v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers International Union, Local 93, of Springfield, Missouri

Mahoney v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers Int’l Union, Loc. 93, of Springfield, Mo., 419 U.S. 825 (1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-10-15
Topic
bankruptcy

holding that the right to testify is one guaranteed by federal law | “The federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.” | "The federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies." | "The federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies." | “The federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.” | same conclusions as in Lyle, supra | same conclusions as in Lyle, supra

Citator

Cited by
28 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.