M-Tron Industries, Inc. v. Hillebrand

comments not direct evidence of discrimination where plaintiff inferred discriminatory intent from the comment | “Summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which Congress and the Supreme Court visualized these cases” | claims based on unauthorized acts (wrongdoing) by the [Government officials sound in tort | evaluation of witness credibility is exclusive function of the jury | distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas case | distinguishing between a “direct evidence” and a McDonnell Douglas case | distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas ease | motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict | claims based on Government misconduct sound in tort | motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict | motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict